The Switch From Wealth to Debtince 1792, our money has been "switched' from
wealth to debt. By changing our money back to wealth, we can reverse the
tide of ever increasing prices, taxes, debt , bankruptcies and economic
ills that are destroying America and her people. How money is put into
circulation is the most important principle. The real issue is not gold
and silver vs. paper, not commodity money vs. fiat money, but wealth vs.
debt, honesty vs. fraud. Let's follow the trail of United States money,
from when it was gold and silver commodity money, put into circulation
as a wealth to the people, by the people, to what it has become - a monetized
debt, put into circulation by the banks, as interest bearing debts to
the people, for the personal profit of bankowners. The real reason gold and silver coinage initially worked well as
money for the people, is that the people produced the gold and silver, a raw resource of
the earth, through their labor. The 1792 Coinage Act allowed
anyone to take that resource to the United States mint and have it monetized (coined) free
of charge. We, the people, furnished our own money, based on our production, as a wealth
to ourselves and spent it into circulation as a benefit to all of society with no debt
attached to it.
This 1922 series ten dollar gold certificate is a good example of
honest money. The note states on it's face "THIS CERTIFIES THAT THERE HAS BEEN
DEPOSITED IN THE TREASURY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TEN DOLLARS IN GOLD COIN PAYABLE
TO THE BEARER ON DEMAND" Fully backed and redeemable paper money that was as good as
gold. Private Bank Note Money. Click on the images to enlarge. Because of the popularity and tactics of these private non-governmental banks the United States National Bank established in 1791 by congress was unable to compete and had to be shut down in 1832. From the beginning private banks have been lobbing congress and congress has been deceived into making laws allowing private banks to take control of our money. Americans have lacked this understanding. Lack of understanding is
why America is the world's greatest debtor nation with over $26 Trillion in public and
private debt at the end of 1990. Throughout the nineteenth century, larger banks worked to get laws
passed that would consolidate all paper money issuance under the control of just a few.
After years of hard lobbying and manipulation, The banking �lite made a major leap
forward under the guise of a standardized national money. They were successful in 1863
with the passage of the National Banking Act. It allowed newly chartered (privately owned)
national banks to create new uniform national bank notes. A few years later their efforts
payed off again, getting the federal government to tax state bank notes out of existence.
Then in 1873 another triumph in getting the government to stop all free coinage of metals.
To fully establish this newly nationalized form of fiat (fraud) money it's creators began
switching the backing of paper money from gold and silver to United States Certificates of
indebtedness "United States Bonds". Forcing the government to create
certificates of debt as security for the paper currency. Real money was removed from
circulation first by government mandated confiscation in 1933 then by revaluation in 1973.
Our "We the people" owned money was completely replaced with fiat money
distributed by the unconstitutional and privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.
"I cannot morally blame all Americans for allowing, for
instance, the birth of the Federal Reserve System (a private cartel with full control over
the issuance of national debt) and the money destruction that has followed. They are
simply ignorant about it and don't know what happened or what is happening. They think
that prices go up rather than that dollars go down. Unsound money imposes an environment
of immorality, which in turn makes people behave in different ways for reasons they know
not. Sometimes you can blame immorality for the imposition of bad structures (bad people
do it with full knowledge of what they are doing), but sometimes it is simply stupidity.
People revere democracy, but democracy ends in plunder by the majority. Are people immoral
for supporting democracy? I think rather that they lack a deep understanding of its
essence. At a very deep level, I would say that the reason such structures are created is
due to both a lack of knowledge and a false morality, which in turn is due to a lack of
knowledge." |