Send this article to a friend:

July
19
2025

Green Agenda Fallout: Democrat-Led Northeast Now Has Highest Electricity Prices In Nation 
 Tyler Durden

Reeling from their 2024 election loss, Democrats are scrambling to reconnect with the working class—yet their brilliant strategy of embracing socialist and communist candidates, doubling down on un-American woke ideology, shielding criminal illegal aliens, and supporting dark-money NGOs that fuel insurrectionist behavior like the Los Angeles riots—isn't a comeback plan but just political suicide. 

The party of leftist social justice warriors is cracking under the weight of its own failures. Woke culture is imploding, "green" fantasies are backfiring, and nowhere is this more evident than in the Democrat stronghold states of the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast, where the retirement of stable, affordable fossil fuel power in favor of unreliable solar and wind is driving up energy costs to the highest in the nation this summerand breaking the pocketbooks of working-class families they claim to champion. 

Energy policies should balance three key objectives: affordability, reliability, and environmental sustainability — often referred to as the "energy trilemma." Yet Democrats rammed through climate policies that torched two objectives, affordability and reliability for the environment.

According to the latest EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook for July, the average summer wholesale power prices across the PJM, NYISO, and ISO-NE grids are the highest in the nation. These prices now far exceed those in Texas' ERCOT, the U.S. average, and even the traditionally high-cost West Coast markets. The blame is squarely focused on the Democrats' initiative to decarbonize power grids

Whatever happened to the Biden-Harris regime's Inflation Reduction Act (green new deal scam)?? 

The PJM grid, the operator of the largest U.S. power grid serving 65 million people across 13 states and D.C., has been transformed into an unstable mess:

In Maryland:

We've warned over the last year about the power crisis unfolding across the Mid-Atlantic:

Last month, Pennsylvania boasted about saving Maryland's power grid from near collapse:

The result of failed green policies and surging power demand is a crisis that's hitting working-poor households the hardest. Democrats are now scrambling—especially in Maryland—to regain narrative control of mounting dissent among voters (read here) over skyrocketing electricity bills. The green agenda is backfiring, and the optics are brutal for crazed progressives. One alarming estimate suggests that nearly 20% of households in central Maryland are behind on their utility payments. 

Voters should demand accountability for failed green energy policies that undermine grid reliability. It's as if the whole climate agenda appears to be sabotaging the nation's energy stability through unrealistic targets and premature fossil fuel phaseouts. Meanwhile, in the global superpower race, China is rapidly expanding coal-fired power generation to ensure base-load reliability. There needs to be accountability.

 



 

our mission:

to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.

...responsibly used.

The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.

 

 

www.zerohedge.com

Send this article to a friend: