Solar Panel Importers Face Tariff Deadline Crunch
Tyler Durden

Companies that imported millions of Southeast Asian solar panels could have to pay tariffs on them "ranging from 30% to more than 230%", according to a new report from Bloomberg. 

Companies have until December 3rd to install the panels, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection has pledged strict enforcement to prevent stockpiling, potentially exposing importers to audits, inspections, and billions in backdated tariff costs.

Tom Beline, a trade attorney and partner in Cassidy Levy Kent’s Washington office, told Bloomberg: “That bill will shock a lot of people.” 

The issue stems from a 2022 tariff holiday ordered by President Biden to ease the impact of a trade probe that slowed solar projects. The Commerce Department later found manufacturers were dodging Chinese solar tariffs by assembling products in Southeast Asia.

While tariffs were extended to these nations, Biden delayed enforcement until June. To address a surge in duty-free imports, the administration set a December deadline for using the panels.

Bloomberg writes that federal regulators have warned importers for months that they must prove panels are “utilized” or face retroactive tariffs, rejecting loopholes like destroying panels or temporary warehouse installations.

Despite a last-minute push, analysts estimate 30 to 40 gigawatts of imported panels remain unused—over two-thirds of the U.S.'s annual panel demand. BloombergNEF data shows more than 30 gigawatts failed to meet the deadline.

Tim Brightbill, a trade lawyer and partner at Wiley Rein, said: “Given that the domestic industry is still facing a price collapse and a surge of imports that have left years of inventory still in warehouses, the enforcement of this circumvention regime remains extremely important to the domestic industry.”

Most manufactures told Bloomberg they weren't stockpiling or didn't comment. Art Fletcher, Invenergy’s executive vice president for domestic content said: “All modules that we imported into the US have been deployed at project sites to meet domestic energy demand across the country, including a de minimus number of modules being held on site for parts and maintenance.”

But the crackdown adds uncertainty for solar developers, compounding trade probes, concerns over renewable tax credits, and former President Trump’s tariff policies.

By Zerohedge.com

our mission:

to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.

...responsibly used.

The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.

 

www.zerohedge.com