Trump Wins, Sends 'Trumpquake' Through Washington Tyler Durden
Goldman’s chief economist Jan Hatzius provided clients, shortly after the official call by AP on a Trump win, the six main points of what this means in the political game in Washington, the economy, and markets:
The people of America gave @realDonaldTrump a crystal clear mandate for change tonight
Media outlets have called the presidential election for Donald Trump, who looks likely to win 312 electoral votes. In the Senate, two Democratic-held seats (Ohio and West Virginia) have flipped to Republicans, giving Republicans the majority. The Republican candidate for the Democratic-held Montana seat holds a wide lead but with little vote reported so far, and Republican candidates lead narrowly in four additional Democratic-held seats (Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin). This likely gives Republicans at least 52 seats in the Senate, with a potential of 56 seats if margins in uncalled races hold.
In the House, the outlook is still unclear but leans Republican. Thus far, media outlets have called two seats that have flipped, one Democratic-held and one Republican-held. A number of additional competitive seats have very narrow margins but have not yet been called. As the partial results stood at 2am ET on Nov. 6, the House margin looks likely to be very similar to the current 221R-214D composition (excluding vacancies), with the potential for small Democratic net gains but potentially not quite enough to take the majority. Prediction markets currently put the odds of a Republican sweep at around 90%. With many potentially decisive races in California where the vote could take several days to count, the House outcome might not become entirely clear until later this week or, possibly, next week.
If Republicans win a narrow majority in the House, this would allow for full extension of the 2017 tax cuts that expire at the end of 2025, likely including reinstatement of some expired business investment incentives. We expect that congressional Republicans would support modest additional tax cuts to accommodate some of Trump’s campaign proposals, but expect these proposals would be scaled down and would cut taxes by a few tenths of a percent of GDP, primarily focused on individual income taxes (not corporate). In a Republican sweep, we would also expect federal spending growth to rise somewhat, particularly on defense. While a larger Senate margin (e.g. 55 or 56 seats) could result in greater Republican support for spending cuts in other parts of the budget (i.e., “mandatory” spending on benefit programs), the thin margin in the House might nevertheless pose an obstacle to such plans. By contrast, in the less likely scenario that Democrats win a very slim House majority, we would expect somewhat greater fiscal restraint as the modest net tax cuts we expect under a Republican sweep would be unlikely, and some of the upper-income tax cuts would be more likely to expire at the end of 2025.
On tariffs, we would expect Trump to impose tariffs on imports from China that average an additional 20pp. While the 10-20% across-the-board tariff that Trump has proposed is not our base case, we believe it is very possible (40% chance) that such a tariff will be implemented. We expect auto tariffs to come into focus and we assume tariffs on auto imports from the EU, though this could be applied more broadly. We estimate that this combination of tariff policies would provide a one-time boost to core PCE inflation that peaks at 30-40bp and a modest drag on GDP.
On immigration, we expect an incoming Trump administration will reduce immigration to around 750k/year, slightly below the 1mn pre-pandemic trend. In the event that Democrats manage to win a narrow House majority, we would expect immigration to decline less, to a pace around 1.25mn/yr. The difference arises from the greater enforcement funding a Republican-controlled Congress would likely approve that would be unlikely in a divided government scenario.
On regulation, an incoming Trump administration would likely take a lighter-touch approach, particularly with regard to energy, financial, and labor policies. By contrast, while some aspects of antitrust policy might ease slightly, we would expect scrutiny of the tech sector to continue.
* * *
Update (Wednesday 0620ET):
Trump was elected the 47th president by the American people.
AP Race Call: Donald Trump is elected the 47th president of the U.S.
Fox News declared victory for the former president hours ago, and now AP News has confirmed he successfully flipped the battleground state of Wisconsin. This battleground state win pushes his electoral votes over the 270 threshold, securing his return to the White House.
With votes still being counted, Trump might actually sweep most swing states.
The voting shift to Trump from 2020 is nationwide.
Here's more on Trump's election performance via Punchbowl News:
Trump's stunning evisceration of the Blue Wall and Vice President Kamala Harris' underperformance in all corners of the country has ushered in a new era for U.S. politics — a dramatic shift rightward.
Trump's all-but-official victory is stunning in its completeness. The former president is on track to sweep all seven of the key battleground states, a huge reversal from 2020. Trump will even win the popular vote by millions of votes. He lost that badly in the last two campaigns.
CNN was shocked about Harris' underperformance...
Jake Tapper shocked by map that shows that Kamala Harris did not out perform Joe Biden in a single county: Jake Tapper: "Holy smokes! Literally nothing? Literally not one county?"
The Senate, as expected, has flipped to the Republicans. What's currently a 51-49 GOP majority could dramatically expand with Trump-fueled victories. If the current numbers hold, Republicans could be looking at a 56-44 majority, the most in nearly a century. Not even the most optimistic Republicans predicted that they'd win seven Democratic-held seats.
Republican Bernie Moreno defeated Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown in Ohio. Jim Justice won in West Virginia. GOP challengers are leading in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Montana. In Nevada, don't count out Democratic Sen. Jacky Rosen yet. But Republicans fended off challengers in Florida, Texas and Nebraska, dashing already-slim Democratic hopes of holding onto the Senate
This big Senate majority would give Trump a real chance to enact his agenda and get his Cabinet confirmed without major issues. Furthermore, Trump may be able to add to the 6-3 Supreme Court majority that he built from 2017 to 2021.
The battle for the House is still too close to call. Yet Johnson could fulfill his prediction and keep the House majority, giving Republicans a trifecta for the next two years.
Recapping on the takeaways from the race via NBC News...
Latinos swing dramatically to Trump
Harris gains with white women and college graduates
The abortion issue wasn’t a panacea for Democrats
The battle for the House is headed for overtime
And this.
🚨JUST IN: FOX News reporting that AP Votecast projects Trump winning a STAGGERING 23% of Black Men nationwide.
WATTERS: “A defeat for the mainstream media who's just destroyed Donald Trump as a racist for all these years."
"This election was Trump vs. Kamala, the Obamas, the deep state, the media, every major corporation, every celebrity, every musician, every university, all social media platforms (except this one), the RINOs, and even the Avengers," Kyle Mann, Editor-in-chief of The Babylon Bee, wrote on X.
This election was Trump vs. Kamala, the Obamas, the deep state, the media, every major corporation, every celebrity, every musician, every university, all social media platforms (except this one), the RINOs, and even the Avengers.
Harris has won California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine’s District 1, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nebraska’s District 2, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Minnesota.
Trump has won Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wyoming, Pennsylvania. Wisconsin, and Maine District 2.
Trump leads the popular vote by over 5 million - quite a massive swing for Republicans (what happened to the 81 million "Americans" that voted for Biden?)...
Of the seven critical battleground states, four have been called and both for Trump - Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin - and he is leading in the others.
Republicans won control of the US Senate
...(flipping Ohio and West Virginia), giving them powerful leverage in high-stakes tax and spending battles ahead.
our mission:
to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.
...responsibly used.
The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.
Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.
