Americans Need $5.3 Million Net Worth To Be Considered
Financially Successful: Survey
Tyler Durden

Americans have high expectations of what it means to be financially successful, but many of them do not expect to meet their desired level of success, according to a survey by financial planning company Empower.

An annual salary in excess of $270,000 is needed for a person to be considered successful in the United States, the Nov. 22 survey found.

In terms of net worth, the threshold is at $5.3 million.

As The Epoch Times' Naveen Athrappully reports, according to the Social Security Administration, the national average wage last year was $66,621. Meanwhile, the average net worth of a family in 2022 was $1.06 million, according to data from the U.S. Federal Reserve.

Amid high expectations, almost half of the respondents said they will never achieve the success level set for themselves. Currently, just above one-third consider themselves to be financially successful. Half the respondents said they are not better off than their parents, and will never be.

The state of the economy and insufficient or irregular incomes were cited by respondents as major challenges to achieving their desired level of success.

Other factors include not knowing how to manage finances, not having clear financial goals, overspending, debts, and delaying financial planning.

In May a report from the U.S. Federal Reserve revealed that the share of Americans doing “at least okay financially” fell from 78 percent in 2021 to 72 percent last year. Even though inflation declined in 2023, it continued to be cited as a key financial concern.

The financial situation for a majority of adults worsened compared to the previous year because of changes in the prices of goods and services, the report said.

A Gallup survey from earlier this year found that inflation was cited by all income groups as a key financial problem, with more than 40 percent of households on annual incomes of more than $100,000 worried about the issue.

Inflation Weighing on Lifestyle

An October report from Bank of America found that around 20 percent of households with annual incomes higher than $150,000 appear to be living paycheck to paycheck. Bank of America speculated that the reason could be tied to home purchases.

“Higher-income households may have bought larger, more expensive, homes and consequently have bigger mortgages. And often along with bigger homes come bigger insurance costs, property taxes, and utility bills,” the report said.

According to an April report from financial service company PYMNTS, one-third of high earners were living paycheck to paycheck. Among those earning $100,000, this figure was 48 percent.

More than 20 percent of individuals making over $200,000 and fully dependent on monthly salaries to make ends meet said they were living with tight budgets because of insufficient income.

During his election campaign, former President Donald Trump vowed to tackle inflation.

The Republican Party has proposed broad measures to lower inflation, one of which involves boosting American energy production.

“Republicans will unleash energy production from all sources, including nuclear, to immediately slash Inflation and power American homes, cars, and factories with reliable, abundant, and affordable energy,” states the GOP 2024 platform document.

Other proposals include reining in wasteful federal spending and cutting down costly and burdensome regulations. Republicans also aim to stop illegal border crossings into the United States and deport illegal immigrants.

Open border policies have resulted in driving up the cost of housing, health care, and education for Americans, the document states, suggesting that tackling the immigration crisis would contribute to lowering inflation as well.

However, Ralph McLaughlin, senior economist at real estate listings website Realtor, says president-elect Trump’s proposed crackdown on illegal immigration could end up having “large and negative consequences on the U.S. housing market in both the short and long run.”

McLaughlin said deporting illegal immigrants could “severely hurt the labor supply needed for new homebuilding since up to a third of residential construction employment consists of foreign-born workers.”

In the long run, the “broader economy” could end up being negatively affected, he said.

our mission:

to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.

...responsibly used.

The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.

 

 

www.zerohedge.com