Earnings Call Mentions Of "Consumer Downturn" Soar
To Highest Level Since Financial Crisis
Tyler Durden

Goldman Sachs analyst Scott Feiler told clients this AM the consumer is experiencing a "noticeable slowdown, moderation, or whatever term we choose to use—it's quite evident by now." 

Across industries—from luxury brands, airlines, and travel companies to fast-food chains, theme parks, and consumer goods companies—profit warnings and management teams have signaled that a consumer slowdown continues to gain momentum.

Low/mid-tier consumers seem to have reached their limit in absorbing price hikes on goods and services, thanks to depleted personal savings and maxed-out credit cards. This is due to a period of elevated inflation and high interest rates under failed Bideonomics. 

The second quarter has displayed unmistakable signs of a consumer slowdown, with the latest credit card data from the Federal Reserve also indicating that some consumers have hit a proverbial 'brick wall.' 

For deeper insight into the views of management teams and the analysts who engage with white-collar execs on earnings calls, we've identified several key phrases regarding the consumer mentioned on earnings calls that provide a glimpse into the overall tone on Wall Street. Spoiler alert: the tone is not great.

Let's begin with the number of times "consumer downturn" was mentioned on earnings calls, spiking to six this earnings season, the highest level since GFC. 

The number of times "cautious consumer" was mentioned 33 times, a record high. 

"Consumer pressure" mentions still lingers near record highs. 

"Consumer weakness" mentions surged again. 

Talk of "low-income" consumers remains extremely elevated. 

Conversations about "credit card debt" are near record highs.

The last time "trading down" spiked on earnings calls was during the GFC. 

Talk of "hard landing" remains high. 

Perhaps the 'sudden recession' scare earlier this week makes much more sense, given the consumer weakness.

our mission:

to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.

...responsibly used.

The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.

 

www.zerohedge.com