Send this article to a friend: July |
Revising away the Recession The incumbent government's job-one in an election year is to make all news read like we've gone in the right direction, but where are we really headed? In today’s news, John Rubino puts us on “recession watch,” confirming the things from his perspective that I’ve been saying about our slow slide into recession, despite how the latest “real” GDP report from the Biden administration turned out, which I think was a lot less than “real.” Several typically reliable signs of recession are now in playHere are bullet points of the reasons in his article for believing we are sliding into recession:
That’s uberbearish.
Jobs are JOLTing downwardI’ve said much about the unreliability of labor metrics and noted that the recent upturn in jobs might be another one-time flash in the pan because it looks to me overall like jobs are finally turning downward (unemployment upward). I noted last week that the Sahm’s Rule, which says recessions start when unemployment rises 0.5% above its cyclical low, and which had just kicked in, had been slightly undone by last weeks jobs report:
So, unemployment may have dipped meagerly below the Sahm’s warning level, but that turns out to be just another head fake in the broken metric as today went right back to unemployment rising. These head fakes, I said are something I’ve been expecting along the way:
So, it is not surprising that the little rise in jobs last week is undone this week, sending things back to the level that means a recession is starting. (If not underway, given the broken metrics involved here.) I’ve always said recession will be underway by the time the labor metrics start showing anything reliably to the Fed.
Well, the gauge is wavering, but it looks this week like the turn is holding. According to the Biden administration’s GDP report, we are far from in a recession, but according to the most reliable recession indicators known to mankind, such as the Sahm’s Rule and the reversion of the yield curve to normal, we are either just starting a recession or already in one. According to numerous other metrics, some of which I laid out in Friday’s Deeper Dive, we are also already in a recession. Now jobs fall and unemployment rises, again, back in line with being exactly where we would expect them to be if we were starting into a recession today. (Of course, I expect that they arrived a little late due to the broken nature of those metrics because of the Pandemic lockdowns throwing all normal metrics way out of whack. But either way, we’re here now according to most measures.) Zero Hedge refers to today’s JOLTS report on labor as “catastrophic.”
ZH noted at the start of its article that the head-fake improvement in jobs in last month’s JOLTS report was due entirely to government hiring and that this got somewhat revised away. Then they made the following observation about today’s report:
And, yet, even with all that government hiring, the Biden Admin. couldn’t offset all the other negativity in the labor market, so the overall JOLTS report still ended “catastrophically” down.
However, the worst news was not in new job openings or the declining number of people confident enough to quit in order to find a better job, but in the number of actual hires: Worst since the Covidcrash. And then there is this:
Nearly 70% of the sweetened number of new jobs are government estimates. They wouldn’t lean high, would they?
Revising away the bad news Speaking of endlessly revised numbers—the kind that are reported strong at first but are, for some reason almost always revised to worse when no one is looking anymore, let’s take a look at the government’s report on consumer confidence. Well, actually, let’s just look at how the revisions keep coming in: Notably, the June revision of consumer confidence, took us out of economic-expansion territory that was first reported and put us clearly into economic contraction. The nice thing about the revision approach is that, besides saving the bad news until no one is really looking at that month any more, the sudden revision in the next makes it easier for that month to go UP, which July did … barely back into expansion to look stable for now. Next month, of course, it will be revised back down into contraction, which will make it easier for August to go up from the newly lowered benchmark of July. It should be noted as ALWAYS being suspicious when all revisions (but one) go the way that is best for the government’s show-and-tell for months on end. If the revisions were due to errors or better data, we’d expect them to run +/- (both ways). Finally, if you look at the aggregate of various measures of consumer confidence, then by any one of them we are now erasing our recovery out of the Covidcrash: Consumer purchase plans for the big-ticket items are also plunging deep into recession levels, too: (Below 50 is recessionary on this gauge.)
Economic, Social and Political News of Our Troubled Times -- a non-partisan daily collection of the most consequential stories about our complex times from multiple sources around the world. |
Send this article to a friend: