McDonald's Top US Exec 'McFact-Checks' Social Media Buzz Around $18 Big Macs
Tyler Durden
 A top-level McDonald's executive was fed up with social media users complaining about out-of-control 'Mcflation,' more precisely, $18 Big Macs, and wanted to set the record straight. The exec called "viral social posts" about burger inflation "poorly sourced." This comes as the burger chain is preparing to reintroduce the $5 meal deal to retain consumers as failed Bidenomics crushes the working poor, resulting in a price war between other burger chains (read here).
"Recently, we have seen viral social posts and poorly sourced reports that McDonald's has raised prices significantly beyond inflationary rates. This is inaccurate," Joe Erlinger, president of McDonald's USA, wrote in an open letter.
Erlinger said, "Americans across the country are making tough calls about where to spend their hard-earned money," adding, "And while we've been working hard to make sure our fans have great reasons to visit us, it's clear that we — together with our franchisees — must remain laser-focused on value and affordability."
Erlinger is addressing these X posts...
"I can tell you that it frustrates and worries me, and many of our franchisees, when I hear about an $18 Big Mac meal being sold," the exec said, adding, "More worrying, though, is when people believe that this is the rule and not the exception, or when folks start to suggest that the prices of a Big Mac have risen 100% since 2019."
He provides his McFacts...
The average price of a Big Mac in the US was $4.39 in 2019. Despite a global pandemic and historic rises in supply chain costs, wages and other inflationary pressures in the years that followed, the average cost is now $5.29. That's an increase of 21% (not 100%).
Erlinger's open letter comes as reported same-store sales missed Wall Street's expectations in its first-quarter earnings report as low-income consumers pulled back. Beginning June 25, the company will reintroduce a $5 value meal.
We suspect Erlinger's open letter alone won't change the perspective working poor consumers have on the burger chain - as prices have risen significantly, not just with food away from home but at home. Also, the failed era of Bidenomics and out-of-control fiscal stealth stimulus risks a reacceleration of inflation.
 our mission:
to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.
...responsibly used.
The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.
Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.
www.zerohedge.com
| 
