Battered Budget Airlines Ask White House For $2.5 Billion Lifeline
Tyler Durden

Budget airlines have requested a $2.5 billion relief package from the Trump administration following a meeting with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy early last week. This comes as elevated jet fuel prices squeeze operations, and after President Trump confirmed late last week that a possible U.S. takeover of bankrupt Spirit Airlines is under consideration.

The Wall Street Journal reports that a group of budget airlines, including Frontier and Avelo, has requested federal support in exchange for convertible equity stakes in the airlines. The $2.5 billion figure is based on extra fuel costs if jet fuel prices remain above $4 per gallon through the second half of the year.

WSJ cited people familiar with the potential economic aid package and said talks will continue this week.

Trump last week told reporters that he likes "having a lot of airlines, so it's competitive." Plus, the optics of multiple airline failures that could result in thousands of job losses would be optically displeasing for the administration in the midterm election cycle.

Apparently, the request is separate from the potential taxpayer-funded takeover of Spirit, which Trump confirmed last week was a very real possibility "if the price was right."

Trump told reporters:

So we are looking at Spirit. It's in bankruptcy court. And we're looking, if we could get it for the right price, I'd do it to save the jobs.

Budget carriers have been under tremendous strain since the U.S.-Iran conflict and the closure of the Hormuz chokepoint sent jet fuel prices in New York to $5 per gallon. It appears some of these airlines might not have been properly hedged against such a spike in fuel costs, which has squeezed margins and led to outlook downgrades.

Larger carriers such as United and American have also slashed outlooks because of surging fuel costs, though they say ticket and baggage fee hikes have helped offset some of the extra costs. We noted that Delta remains one of the best-positioned airlines due to its in-house oil refinery.

The S&P 500 Airline Index has struggled to recover and is down 13.5% from its high just before the conflict began.

During the Covid era, U.S. airlines received $54 billion in federal grants and loans to avert mass layoffs after air traffic nearly came to a standstill.

our mission:

to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.

...responsibly used.

The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.

 

www.zerohedge.com