America's War On Coal Power-Plants Is Over Tyler Durden
Al Gore's worst nightmare, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright told Bloomberg TV hosts on Tuesday that coal-fired power plants will remain the backbone of President Trump's reindustrialization of America. Wright emphasized that coal plants will be restarted to ensure affordable and reliable electricity for decades.
"What's been the big issues for this president that he ran on, you know, the economic well-being of Americans and the National Security of our country. And our citizens, so we've had 20-plus years of sort of deindustrializing the United States and letting our heavy industry flow overseas. This president is passionate about increasing National Security, and that means we have to have the ability to build heavy steel-intensive and aluminum-intensive material systems in our country again. So this is an attempt, I believe, by our president to incentivize the reindustrialization of America," Wright told Bloomberg hosts.
When asked about energy security and coal's role, Wright responded: "Coal has been essential to the United States' energy system for over 100 years. It's been the largest source of global electricity for nearly 100 years, and it will be for decades to come, so we need to be realistic about that - now with coal, are we going to see a renaissance in surging coal production in the US - not likely - but we're on a path to continually shrink the electricity we generate from coal - that's made electricity more expensive and our grid less stable. So I think the best we can hope for in the short term is to stop the closure of coal power plants no one has won by that action."
He continued: "The goal is just affordable, reliable, secure energy from wherever that comes from obviously, there's going to be roles in the long run for solar energy. There are places where it makes tons of sense where the natural resources are there and the infrastructure is benefited by adding more solar to the grid, but I will say one thing for sure: we're not going to go down the road of Germany - you know they spent a half a trillion dollars - they more than doubled their price of electricity - they actually shrunk the total amount of electricity the country produces by about 20% - and their industry is fleeing the country - that's the path the United States was starting to go down, but that's the wrong path."
The coal discussion starts around the four-minute mark...
The latest data from Bloomberg shows coal accounts for about 20.5% of power generation today.
"It's not immediately clear what actions the US could take to help prevent coal-fired power plants from closing,"Bloomberg noted.
Michelle Bloodworth, president of America's Power, a trade group representing Core Natural Resources and Peabody Energy, explained that many coal plants have been shuttered over the years because "bad policies have made them uneconomic." He noted, "Fortunately, President Trump is seeking to change this."
The entire global warming NGO machine must be having a meltdown over Wright's remarks. With USAID funding slashed, one has to wonder—how will they bankroll Greta Thunberg's marches now?
Trump's nominee for Energy Secretary Chris Wright dispels the climate propaganda. He is Al Gore's worst nightmare.pic.twitter.com/DfMP1qhh5v
Earlier Wednesday, PJM Interconnection—which coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity and ensures power supplies for 65 million people across all or parts of 13 Eastern and Midwestern US states, as well as Washington, DC, outlined how it will fast-track NatGas power generators to ensure grid stability as "The Next AI Trade" and Powering Up America theme progresses ahead.
Nation's Largest Grid To Fast-Track NatGas Power Plants To Fuel Next AI Trade https://t.co/FbdbP9xN6e
Peabody Energy, the top US coal miner, has yet to catch a bid, blowing through three years of support.
After a decade and a half of the 'green cult' forcing the nation to buy Chinese green tech and wind down all fossil fuel power generation, the Russell 3000 Coal Subsector Index trades near decade lows. The question is whether Trump's pro-grid stability policies reverse these toxic trends.
The nation needs grid stability before nuclear power is ramped up in the 2030s. The only way for that to occur is through coal and NatGas power generators amid rising power demand from AI data centers, electric vehicles, onshoring, and other electrification trends.
our mission:
to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.
...responsibly used.
The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.
Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.